De Jure Statelessness in the Real World: Applying the Prato Summary Conclusions

Publié : 3/Mar/2011
Source: Open Society Foundations

by Laura BinghamJulia Harrington Reddy & Sebastian Kohn   Open Society Justice Initiative

This Open Society Justice Initiative paper examines the definition of a stateless person under international law and the implications this definition has for victims of statelessness around the world.

In May 2010, a group of experts met in Prato, Italy, to discuss the definition of a stateless person under international law. The meeting was organized by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and addressed both the interpretation of the definition of a de jure stateless person under Article 1(1) of the 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons, and more generally the definition of a de facto stateless person. The summary conclusions of the meeting are available from the UNHCR website.

De Jure Statelessness in the Real World: Applying the Prato Summary Conclusions aims to show how the Prato Summary Conclusions apply to stateless persons around the world. The paper demonstrates that most stateless populations that the Justice Initiative works with have links with only one state—the state where they were born and physically reside.

In accordance with the Prato Summary Conclusions, the Justice Initiative considers these populations to be de jure stateless on the basis that the states in question do not consider these resident populations as their nationals. In fact, a majority of the world’s stateless people likely fall into this category, as illustrated by the numerous examples set forth in the paper.

Download paper from Open Society Foundations website.

Thèmes: Apatridie
Les régions: International, Kenya, République Démocratique du Congo, Somalie, Mauritanie, Ethiopie, Érythrée, République Arabe Sahraouie Démocratique (Sahara Occidental), Guinée Équatoriale
An: 2011